Is it possible to run analysis services 2000 and analysis services 2005
on the same computer?
I'm looking to migrate, but need to run production in both environments
concurrently until we're ready...eric.schleicher@.gmail.com wrote:
> Is it possible to run analysis services 2000 and analysis services 2005
> on the same computer?
> I'm looking to migrate, but need to run production in both environments
> concurrently until we're ready...
>
not tried it myself, but I believe not|||I found that you can run them concurrently, one just has to install the
AS2005 as a named instance (as AS2000 does not support "non default"
instances)
Showing posts with label hardware. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hardware. Show all posts
Friday, March 30, 2012
running AS 2000 and AS 2005 on same hardware...
Is it possible to run analysis services 2000 and analysis services 2005
on the same computer?
I'm looking to migrate, but need to run production in both environments
concurrently until we're ready...
eric.schleicher@.gmail.com wrote:
> Is it possible to run analysis services 2000 and analysis services 2005
> on the same computer?
> I'm looking to migrate, but need to run production in both environments
> concurrently until we're ready...
>
not tried it myself, but I believe not
|||I found that you can run them concurrently, one just has to install the
AS2005 as a named instance (as AS2000 does not support "non default"
instances)
on the same computer?
I'm looking to migrate, but need to run production in both environments
concurrently until we're ready...
eric.schleicher@.gmail.com wrote:
> Is it possible to run analysis services 2000 and analysis services 2005
> on the same computer?
> I'm looking to migrate, but need to run production in both environments
> concurrently until we're ready...
>
not tried it myself, but I believe not
|||I found that you can run them concurrently, one just has to install the
AS2005 as a named instance (as AS2000 does not support "non default"
instances)
running AS 2000 and AS 2005 on same hardware...
Is it possible to run analysis services 2000 and analysis services 2005
on the same computer?
I'm looking to migrate, but need to run production in both environments
concurrently until we're ready...eric.schleicher@.gmail.com wrote:
> Is it possible to run analysis services 2000 and analysis services 2005
> on the same computer?
> I'm looking to migrate, but need to run production in both environments
> concurrently until we're ready...
>
not tried it myself, but I believe not|||I found that you can run them concurrently, one just has to install the
AS2005 as a named instance (as AS2000 does not support "non default"
instances)sql
on the same computer?
I'm looking to migrate, but need to run production in both environments
concurrently until we're ready...eric.schleicher@.gmail.com wrote:
> Is it possible to run analysis services 2000 and analysis services 2005
> on the same computer?
> I'm looking to migrate, but need to run production in both environments
> concurrently until we're ready...
>
not tried it myself, but I believe not|||I found that you can run them concurrently, one just has to install the
AS2005 as a named instance (as AS2000 does not support "non default"
instances)sql
Friday, March 23, 2012
running 32bit standard edition on 64bit hardware?
I just found out that the hardware that came uses 64bit AMD. But the
Windows Server 2003 license is for Standard Edition; a 32bit version.
What kind of performance hit would I take if I ran the Standard Edition
on the 64bit hardware?
Thanks,
Mark.None.
If you install the 64 bit OS, your executables will be a bit larger and
yoyu'll use a bit more memory. But then, you can install way more memory :)
"Mark" <murkynow50@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:OreRLT8%23HHA.4184@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>I just found out that the hardware that came uses 64bit AMD. But the
>Windows Server 2003 license is for Standard Edition; a 32bit version.
> What kind of performance hit would I take if I ran the Standard Edition on
> the 64bit hardware?
> Thanks,
> Mark.|||Mark wrote:
> I just found out that the hardware that came uses 64bit AMD. But the
> Windows Server 2003 license is for Standard Edition; a 32bit version.
> What kind of performance hit would I take if I ran the Standard Edition
> on the 64bit hardware?
> Thanks,
> Mark.
Sorry about this posting. I meant to post it in the windows section.
Mark.
Windows Server 2003 license is for Standard Edition; a 32bit version.
What kind of performance hit would I take if I ran the Standard Edition
on the 64bit hardware?
Thanks,
Mark.None.
If you install the 64 bit OS, your executables will be a bit larger and
yoyu'll use a bit more memory. But then, you can install way more memory :)
"Mark" <murkynow50@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:OreRLT8%23HHA.4184@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>I just found out that the hardware that came uses 64bit AMD. But the
>Windows Server 2003 license is for Standard Edition; a 32bit version.
> What kind of performance hit would I take if I ran the Standard Edition on
> the 64bit hardware?
> Thanks,
> Mark.|||Mark wrote:
> I just found out that the hardware that came uses 64bit AMD. But the
> Windows Server 2003 license is for Standard Edition; a 32bit version.
> What kind of performance hit would I take if I ran the Standard Edition
> on the 64bit hardware?
> Thanks,
> Mark.
Sorry about this posting. I meant to post it in the windows section.
Mark.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)